<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
    <channel>
        <title>ScientistsBaffled.com</title>
        <link>http://www.scientistsbaffled.com/news/</link>
        <description>ScientistsBaffled.com</description>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 02:58:01 -0400</pubDate>
        <generator>ContentFeeder 1.0</generator>
        <item>
            <title>Anthrax!  Aaaaiiiiieeeeee!</title>
            <link>http://www.scientistsbaffled.com/?newsitem=24</link>
            <description>Anthrax and bafflement do not mix.  Well actually they do mix occasionally, but they shouldn't mix, because it means more death and destruction, right?  Right?&#13;&#10;&#13;&#10;Anyway, the New York Daily News reports "Experts baffled by case".  While we applaud the use of "baffled" in the headline, they are obviously trying to downplay the story compared to an accurate headline, which would read "Experts baffled by DEADLY ANTHRAX case."  </description>
            <author>Drew@scientistsbaffled.com</author>
            <dc:date>2006-03-02T18:51:23-05:00</dc:date>
        </item>
        <dc:publisher>ScientistsBaffled.com</dc:publisher>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
        <dc:rights>Copyright (C) 2026 Andrew Davidson. All Rights Reserved. The content of this feed is available for non-commercial use only.</dc:rights>
    </channel>
</rss>
